I am an advocate for Valuation uncompromising system, by way of information I would like to make some notes, some of which are not currently considering.
recovery not taxed by general , but to a greater or lesser degree with the performance of a public works sector of the population, which is represented by the owners or owners of properties that benefit, provided they report a benefit to real property.
The taxable base for the irrigation of the contribution of recovery must take into account these three main tenets. The spread value can not be greater than any of them:
1. The cost of respective work within the limits of the benefit that it produces on buildings that are to be taxed, meaning all the investment cost that the work required, supplemented with a reasonable percentage for contingencies and up to thirty percent (30%) more, for distribution expenses and tax collection. The value of the work to go around, do not have to be 100% of the cost of it, but that may be recovered by other means.
2. The benefit of the property, the value of the contribution can not exceed the gain that is giving the property, you understand what values \u200b\u200bthe property.
3. The purchasing power of the affected population. raise the total value can not exceed the purchasing power of population is benefiting from the work that is being supplied by the contribution of recovery.
is not yet known which are actually the 21 megaprojects. And if all that is going to be collected by the system recovery, I have no clear as recovered some works there described, the buildings of the city and, most significantly, I do not understand what to see the value paid in property taxes and complementary in this year, so I value a work to be executed, and even more so where did the factor of 3.5 times the value of the farm.
reiterate that I agree with a work made by the state enhances my site, and it is fair to pay for this recovery. But if my property is not valued, but my mobility is improved, I pay no recovery, so it is I'm paying my taxes dutifully, in order to improve my mobility, security, justice and order to build educational facilities and bike paths .
If misused recovery system, and then drop off contributions will say it is the mechanism that does not work. Well spent but the mechanism is safe, the law and also supports is fair, because my profits on the property are returned to the state for my contribution. This mechanism can, pledge to take credit for the work once collected and the public benefit has confirmed its recovery, dutifully paid within the times that have been given credit for payment made. Is how are revolving funds that allow to work with resources from progressively.
Carlos Alfonso Potes Victoria
capotesvic@gmail.com
http://carlosalfonsopotes.blogspot.com/
October 7, 2009
Carlos Alfonso Potes Victoria
capotesvic@gmail.com
http://carlosalfonsopotes.blogspot.com/