"Gustavo Moreno" for user
show details 11:51
I agree with everything but with the transfer. I find it unacceptable as a concept from the perspective of the relationship of humans with the environment.
agree on solutions such as the rejection of proposals that make no sense.
only add that it is important to re-take indicator unaccounted water below 30%, and for it to do serious work on micro hydro and measurement sectorization, and promote a culture of respect for the public between users, the benefit of all. Intervention has had successes in this area.
Hugs,
Gustavo Moreno Montalvo
Gustavo, thank you very much for your comments, I have no new data for the company especially in the level of technical and nontechnical losses, because I purposely distanced only once in Once, I think about some things, but definitely among various topics, both fundamental to the establishment of a means of recovery is the reduction of water losses and energy companies such as EMCALI with a concentrated market should be around 23 % in water and 12% in energy, and the other point is that the costs of various kinds must be at least equal, if not lower than the competition, in EMCALI labor costs were almost three times higher, but I received information that are increasing and plans a convention up those costs.
With regard to transferring non-controversial, and that environmental issues are fundamental, but still you have many views, I am sure that given the need for water for the northern and southern Cauca Valley a solution will be environmentally friendly even with additional benefits as are natural systems. The area of \u200b\u200bCandelaria, Puerto Tejada, Corinth, Padilla, Santander de Quilichao and other problems found with the use of water in conflict, for human use water for irrigation, an addition of water height would be appropriate for the area, yes, not causing environmental damage.
Best Regards.
Carlos Alfonso Potes Victoria
capotesvic@gmail.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment